My emacs configuration.
simple grid system based on less.js
Grunt: a task-based command line build tool for JavaScript projects.
The missing package manager for OS X.
martinbalfanz/html5-boilerplate 1
starting html/css template. so much goodness baked in by default
Leaner CSS, in your browser.
Making mozilla.org awesome, one pebble at a time
martinbalfanz/bugzilla-burndown 0
bugzilla-burndown
pull request commentw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-contain-3] Make the query container an element, ++
cc @mirisuzanne
comment created time in an hour
PR opened w3c/csswg-drafts
It is simpler to treat elements as query containers, and delay interaction with the layout box until query-evaluation-time. This makes it possible to answer the question "is this element a container?" sooner, which is beneficial for implementing the feature.
It also seems to make more sense given that we're going to have container features that don't really care about the layout box.
Also:
- Require layout containment for dimensional queries.
- Add 'block-size' as part of the computed value.
pr created time in an hour
pull request commentw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-text-decor-3] [css-text-decor-4] Fix incorrect CSS in text-decoration example
I'm not sure what the etiquette is for getting things reviewed here – what's the best way to get this approved and merged? Hopefully it's a relatively non-controversial change…
comment created time in an hour
issue commentw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-nesting] Conflicts in proposal with Sass/Less
@matthew-dean that is how Sass plans on doing things. At least in the short term. https://github.com/sass/sass/issues/3030#issuecomment-814398281
comment created time in 10 hours
startedjotego/jtframe
started time in 15 hours
issue commentw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-nesting] Conflicts in proposal with Sass/Less
It can be a differentiating factor for preprocessors. If the rule has @nest use native nesting, else use preprocessor nesting.
This is a good point / strategy.
comment created time in 15 hours
fork lukaszklis/obs-tablet-remote
Tablet optimised OBS Remote
http://t2t2.github.io/obs-tablet-remote/
fork in 17 hours
startedchrchr/electric-paren
started time in a day
issue commentw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-pseudo-4] Standardizing input[type="range"] styling
I agree that "handle" is a more intuitive word than "thumb." What about the highlighted range between a start handle and end handle when trimming a video – is that considered the same type of thing as the "progress" section on a slider?
comment created time in a day
startedclassilla/cryanc
started time in a day
issue commentw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-nesting] Conflicts in proposal with Sass/Less
I would probably make @nest mandatory to make it explicit, but the current spec allows to use @nest for every nested rule anyway.
Please don't make @nest mandatory if it doesn't have to be. It adds unnecessary noise to a CSS rule. CSS will look cleaner without it.
It can be a differentiating factor for preprocessors. If the rule has @nest use native nesting, else use preprocessor nesting.
I suspect people will make @nest mandatory through css linting tools but it shouldn't be mandatory at the language level if it doesn't have to be.
comment created time in a day
push eventw3c/csswg-drafts
commit sha e8e14b8b6b313843ffc52d1a59a765d7a51a53b9
[css-nesting-1] demo the result of BEM style nesting (#6276)
push time in 2 days
PR merged w3c/csswg-drafts
[css-nesting-1] fixes #3748
Felt sufficient to demonstrate the result of a BEM style nesting selector, as opposed to a note specifically calling out BEM. The answer is in the examples.
pr closed time in 2 days
issue closedw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-nesting] add note explaining that BEM `&__element` class accumulation isn't supported and why
CSS nesting spec https://drafts.csswg.org/css-nesting-1/
There is a very common method of writing BEM classes among FE developers that looks like this when writing in SCSS:
.block {
&__element {
// .block__element { ... }
}
}
The spec currently doesn't seem to explicitly allow for this style of nesting. Providing an example to mention this method is ok is all that would be needed.
Update:
Apparently that syntax isn't actually allowed. 😢
The spec doesn't clearly explain if the syntax is valid or not though.
Please add a clear example stating that this isn't valid and explain why.
closed time in 2 days
Dan503
startedearlephilhower/esp-quick-toolchain
started time in 2 days
startedtrombik/freebsd-ports-xtensa-lx106-elf
started time in 2 days
startedgreatest-ape/OctaSine
started time in 2 days
startedweclaw1/image-roll
started time in 2 days
startedmrDIMAS/tbc
started time in 2 days
startedhomieiot/homie-esp8266
started time in 2 days
issue commentw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-easing-2] Complex easing/timing functions
Krill Vastletov discussed something similar in this article https://www.kirillvasiltsov.com/writing/how-to-create-a-spring-animation-with-web-animation-api/
comment created time in 2 days
issue commentw3c/csswg-drafts
[css-easing-2] Complex easing/timing functions
I wonder if it'd be even simpler to provide multiple points and just linear interpolate between them. You can produce almost any effect with enough points.
The more complex curves can land later, when folks figure them out.
comment created time in 2 days