Ask questionscmd/vet: potential false positive in the "suspect or" check
go version)?go version go1.11.1 linux/amd64
yes
go env)?GOARCH="amd64"
GOBIN=""
GOCACHE="/home/jnml/.cache/go-build"
GOEXE=""
GOFLAGS=""
GOHOSTARCH="amd64"
GOHOSTOS="linux"
GOOS="linux"
GOPATH="/home/jnml"
GOPROXY=""
GORACE=""
GOROOT="/home/jnml/go"
GOTMPDIR=""
GOTOOLDIR="/home/jnml/go/pkg/tool/linux_amd64"
GCCGO="gccgo"
CC="gcc"
CXX="g++"
CGO_ENABLED="1"
GOMOD=""
CGO_CFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_CPPFLAGS=""
CGO_CXXFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_FFLAGS="-g -O2"
CGO_LDFLAGS="-g -O2"
PKG_CONFIG="pkg-config"
GOGCCFLAGS="-fPIC -m64 -pthread -fmessage-length=0 -fdebug-prefix-map=/tmp/go-build777349074=/tmp/go-build -gno-record-gcc-switches"
Using github.com/cznic/ql, branch file2, checked out at 3497607bfaba518eab540d317a6c168396b8002f.
==== jnml@4670:~/src/github.com/cznic/ql> go test
# github.com/cznic/ql
./file2.go:37: suspect or: szKey != szVal || szKey != szBuf
FAIL github.com/cznic/ql [build failed]
==== jnml@4670:~/src/github.com/cznic/ql>
Build succeeds, tests are executed and failures reported.
Build fails.
The line go vet does not like is here
func init() {
if al := cfile.AllocAllign; al != 16 || al <= binary.MaxVarintLen64 {
panic("internal error")
}
if szKey != szVal || szKey != szBuf { // <-- line 37
panic("internal error")
}
}
const (
magic2 = "\x61\xdbql"
szBuf = szKey
szKey = cfile.AllocAllign // BTree
szVal = szKey // BTree
wal2PageLog = 12 //TODO tune pagelog
)
Line 37 tests for equality of the three values szKey, szValue, szBuf which other code depends on as it would have to be more complicated for the general case and the equality allow simplifying it. I see nothing wrong about the line, I donť think vet should reject it.
The vet test is located here
// checkSuspect checks for expressions of the form
// x != c1 || x != c2
// x == c1 && x == c2
// where c1 and c2 are constant expressions.
// If c1 and c2 are the same then it's redundant;
// if c1 and c2 are different then it's always true or always false.
// Exprs must contain only side effect free expressions.
func (op boolOp) checkSuspect(f *File, exprs []ast.Expr) {
...
}
The comment if c1 and c2 are different then it's always true or always false. is correct, but that does not imply something is wrong.
There's nothing wrong in implementing
a == b == c
in Go as
a == b && a == c
Where the negation, rejected by vet, is
a != b || a != c
Workaround: vet is happy if the expression is rewritten as
szKey != szVal || szVal != szBuf
even though the two versions are logical identities.
Answer
questions
ALTree
@dfang This is not related to the issue reported in this thread, assuming authType is a variable.
This:
authType != "scan" || authType != "web"
is equivalent to true for all possible values of authType, so vet is right: that condition is suspicious. It's not checking anything. It's always true.
Moreover, this:
!(authType == "scan" || authType == "web")
is not equivalent to
authType != "scan" || authType != "web"
so your change is not correct. For example, if authType is "scan" the first condition if false, but the second is true.
Related questions