Ah, I have to add it and deploy before depending on it ;) -- working now.

@justin8, @srethira, Adding environment: {privileged: true} to SimpleSynthAction.standardNpmSynthdidn't seem to help. Was that the wrong place to add it? /me continues to dig

it must be either the full ARN or name of the secret

@skinny85 Is there a way to use just the name of the secret as suggested by the UPDATE_FAILED's reason?

It'd be great to have the above proposed Secret.fromSecretName for the "multiple accounts for multiple environments" use case -- as then references could be kept relative to an account.

Works great; now to figure out what to do when cdk is running from within a docker container as part of CI/CD and I hit Error: spawnSync docker ENOENT. Anyone navigate around this already?

Is there a way to add an index to a table using the CloudFormation Resources Only... /me looks at CloudFormation docs... looks like not yet :( Is there a place to +1 👍 that feature request? Assuming CDK would need that support in order to do it.

Looking good and looking forward to trying these out

Confirm by changing [ ] to [x] below to ensure that it's a bug:

• [x] I've gone though the API reference
• [x] I've checked AWS Forums and StackOverflow for answers
• [x] I've searched for previous similar issues and didn't find any solution

Describe the bug

s3's ListPartsOutput's PartNumberMarker field is documented the same as its NextPartNumberMarker field. But does not return the same ;) NextPartNumberMarker works as documented and PartNumberMarker does not.

See: https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go-v2/blob/40a22fcb842831dd1511cc4a79f9fdc3c308e407/service/s3/api_op_ListParts.go#L201

Version of AWS SDK for Go?

v0.21.0

Version of Go (go version)?

v1.14

To Reproduce (observed behavior) Steps to reproduce the behavior (please share code or minimal repo)

make a ListPartsRequest

Expected behavior

expect a NextPartNumberMarker

Additional context

Instead get PartNumberMarker of 0 over and over :(