profile
viewpoint

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

Office 365 delivering email to To: recipients multiple times when Bcc: set

I have the same issue with BCC when using Office 365. Any workaround?

tmey2016

comment created time in 2 hours

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 8 hours

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

SMTP Validation before Mail Sent

I found this useful too: https://laracasts.com/discuss/channels/general-discussion/check-smtp-connection

admin9039

comment created time in 9 hours

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

SMTP Validation before Mail Sent

I could also use this feature to help add some additional monitoring to a site to know if there are any issues with our SMTP server.

admin9039

comment created time in 10 hours

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 12 hours

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 13 hours

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 19 hours

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in a day

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in a day

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in a day

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in a day

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in a day

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 2 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 2 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 2 days

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

PSR-4 Autoloading And Namespacing

@fabpot Happy to hear that!

I actually totally missed Symfony Mailer:

  • I never heard of it until now
  • googling for "symfony mailer" actually returns the Swift Mailer docs on the Symfony website first
  • there is a small mention of it on the Swift Mailer page, but small enough to miss it
  • installing the latest Symfony version using the website-skeleton still installs Swift Mailer

I can understand that it's not more emphasized at the moment, as the docs say it's experimental. Once it becomes stable, it'd deserve a bit more exposure though.

Anyway it's good news, thank you for releasing it, and I'll be happy to test it, and help improve it if I can.

Is it based on the Swift Mailer codebase? Is it just Swift Mailer with namespaced classes & renamed methods only, or are there more fundamental changes that make it more experimental?

GrahamCampbell

comment created time in 2 days

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

PSR-4 Autoloading And Namespacing

@BenMorel The reality is that nobody forked Swiftmailer to switch to PSR-4.

Instead, I've done all the work with a brand new version that uses modern PHP: Symfony Mailer, which is the successor of Swiftmailer. I can hardly believe that I got no help whatsoever.

GrahamCampbell

comment created time in 2 days

fork vemaeg/swiftmailer

Comprehensive mailing tools for PHP

https://swiftmailer.symfony.com/

fork in 2 days

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

PSR-4 Autoloading And Namespacing

Closing as it's not worth it.

Can hardly believe this comment.

GrahamCampbell

comment created time in 2 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 2 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 2 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 2 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 2 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 2 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 3 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 3 days

PR opened swiftmailer/swiftmailer

bugfix and code refactor: $response var might be initialized fixed; nested condition is converted to guard clause in to improve code readability

<!-- Please fill in this template according to the PR you're about to submit. -->

Q A
Bug fix? yes
New feature? yes/no
Doc update? yes/no
BC breaks? yes/no
Deprecations? yes/no
Fixed tickets #... <!-- #-prefixed issue number(s), if any -->
License MIT

$response var might be initialized - added its initialization to null also nested condition is converted to guard clause in order to improve code readability

+16 -13

0 comment

1 changed file

pr created time in 3 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 3 days

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

Address in mailbox given does not comply with RFC 2822, 3.6.2.

i was also getting this problem when i was sending multiple emails at a time and there was email duplication passed in bcc , to , CC methods

$message->to('abc@gmail.com')->bcc(['abc@gmail.com','johndoe@gmail.com']);

fabienlege

comment created time in 3 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 4 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 4 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 4 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 4 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 5 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 5 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 5 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 5 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

issue closedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

Expected response code 354 but got an empty response

<!-- Please fill in this template according to your issue. -->

Q A
Bug report? yes

closed time in 6 days

vrrayz

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

Expected response code 354 but got an empty response

The issue is your connection timedout, this could be handled more nicely, but basically, avoid keeping connections opens for hour your smtp server will kill the connection to preserve ressources

vrrayz

comment created time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

issue openedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

Expected response code 354 but got an empty response

<!-- Please fill in this template according to your issue. -->

Q A
Bug report? yes

created time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 6 days

PR opened swiftmailer/swiftmailer

Update sending.rst

Hello,

I add in the doc the setEncryption method for servers like Gmail.

<!-- Please fill in this template according to the PR you're about to submit. -->

Q A
Bug fix? no
New feature? no
Doc update? yes
BC breaks? no
Deprecations? no
Fixed tickets no ticket
License MIT

I just add the setEncryption method which was not mentioned in the doc.

Cheers 😉

+9 -0

0 comment

1 changed file

pr created time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 7 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 8 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 8 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 8 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 8 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 8 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

issue closedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

Remove proc_open

Can I use this without having to use proc_open ?

closed time in 9 days

Starlette

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 9 days

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

SMTP Validation before Mail Sent

I'd love to know this, too!

I've run into problems such as the FROM header containing parentheses and I think these are not valid without being escaped. If we had a way to validate before sending, these types of problems could be identified and corrected early.

admin9039

comment created time in 9 days

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

Remove proc_open

Docs say that the proc_* functions are required.

StreamBuffer requires proc_open() and proc_close().

What is the reason you want to avoid using these functions? Your hosting environment? If so, my best recommendation is change providers. Take control of your hosting environment. Don't let your hosting company restrict what you can do with your sites.

Starlette

comment created time in 9 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 10 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 10 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 10 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 10 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 10 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 10 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 11 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 11 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 11 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 11 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 12 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 12 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 12 days

issue commentswiftmailer/swiftmailer

Process could not be started [The system cannot find the path specified. ]

i have the same problem.Any solution? please

chuksdsilent

comment created time in 12 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 12 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 13 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 13 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 13 days

startedswiftmailer/swiftmailer

started time in 13 days

more